Member Login English Home 中文版 日本語版 BBS Blog
Navigation
Home Page
Tungsten's News
Tungsten's News,International
Tungsten's News,China
Powder Metallurgy Technology
News of Molybdenum
News of Refractory Metals
History of Tungsten
Sports & Tungsten
Military & Tungsten
Environment & Tungsten
Radiation Medical & Tungsten
Marketing of Tungsten
Tungsten Ore
Tungsten Oxides & Trioxides
Tungsten、Carbide Powder
Pure Tungsten
Tungsten Welding Electrodes
Tungsten Heavy Alloy
Tungsten Copper
Tungsten Jewelry
Ferro Tungsten
Tungsten Carbides
Tungsten Alloy Darts
Scrap Tungsten
Tungsten Alloy Bucking Bars
Non-ferrous metals
Molybdenum Related
Nickel Related
Cobalt Related
Vanadium Related
Titanium Related
Rare Earth
Technology of tungsten
Acknowledge of tungsten
Academic of tungsten
Research & Development
Patented Technology
Information Services
Information Offer
Advertising
Translation Services
Agent & Representative
Magazines & Books of tungsten
Dirty Bombs
Dirty Bomb vs Clean Bomb: DU(Depleted Uranium) Bomb vs WHA(tungsten heavy alloy) Bomb
Author:Def auth…    Source:Site author    Update Time:2009-9-1 17:58:19

Dirty Bombs


Dirty Bombs

By Matt Balasis on August 30, 2009

MINNEAPOLIS (Herald de Paris) - I like to think of myself as an optimist. A glass half full sort of person. I like to believe most people are kind, that my community is a safe and sound place, that my neighbors are decent folk. I like to think our country is woven from a more or less virtuous moral fiber, that while not perfect we do our best to be a just and fair people, and I believe in our constitution. There are times however when these beliefs take a beating and I end up wondering just what the hell is going on? How could we allow certain things to happen? And, even worse, how in the world do we forgive ourselves for failing to be accountable?

Nine years ago now my nephew Billy came to live with us here in the great Midwest from a small Greek island to attend the University of Minnesota. Shy, tall and thin, his dark hair and dark skin set him apart from most, as did his accent. It was quite a transition, from a place where a blistering sun is the norm to a virtual urban tundra, but he did well and people liked him. He promptly made a friend, a good friend — Gus. I’d heard about him before I met him, outgoing, confident, ambitious, veteran of the Gulf conflict, ex Marine, Billy painted a picture considerably more imposing than the affable and disarming guy I eventually got to know via playstation in the basement. Gus was pretty easy to like, he was funny and engaging and didn’t take himself too seriously, a likable kid, and being an ex Marine myself he pretty much got an automatic thumbs up. We had lots of talks about the Corps, boot camp, and good natured bantering about how things had changed, how (in my opinion) San Diego MCRD (recruit training depot) didn’t compare with Paris Island because the abominable sand fleas were absent in San Diego, about how we didn’t get issued sunscreen at P.I. But my time in the service didn’t compare to his in one important way (although I never told him), he’d seen some action during the 1998 Desert Fox bombing campaign whereas mine was a relatively peaceful tenure — Gus fired off live ordinance at live targets both from sea as well as in the occupied no-man’s-land bordering Kuwait and Iraq — a landscape strewn with the charred artifacts of the Iraq War. He was a good friend to Billy, he didn’t drink, didn’t do drugs, stayed focused on his studies and his dreams, and was always good for a laugh.

It feels now like that time went by in the blink of an eye. With their degrees all but completed they both went their separate ways. Gus got married in September 2002 to a gal named Marti and they moved to Texas and started a family. He finished his BA at the University of San Antonio and landed a great job with Union Pacific Rail Road — Manager of Yard Operations. Billy sure enough went back to his Island paradise and his Greek sweetheart. We stayed put of course somewhere between these two incidental friends from across worlds, raising our own growing family. Things didn’t turn out the way I would have guessed. Something terrible caught up with Gus, something I don’t think anyone saw coming.

The following is from an abstract on a study conducted by the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research institute:

The use of depleted uranium in armor-penetrating munitions remains a source of controversy because of the numerous unanswered questions about its long-term health effects. Although no conclusive epidemiologic data have correlated DU exposure to specific health effects, studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents continue to suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure. Until issues of concern are resolved with further research, the use of depleted uranium by the military will continue to be controversial.

The above study was completed in March of 2007 and was essentially a compilation of data and evidence from other studies on the effects of Depleted Uranium, studies which have in the past and which continue to suggest that Depleted Uranium has a leukemogenic (leukemia causing) effect on biological organisms. In yet another study by Arfsten, Still, and Ritchie at the Naval Health Research Center, there was strong evidence that DU accumulates in tissues including testes, bone, kidneys, and brain and that this particular heavy metal alloy is both genotoxic and mutagenic, which is to say it can effect a cell’s genetic integrity in addition to having carcinogenic properties. Yet the United States, Britain, and France continue to veto U.N. resolutions banning these munitions even in the face of overwhelming international consensus.

Additionally, the World Health Organization continues to maintain their position that Depleted Uranium, as a residual byproduct of open combat, has not been proven to cause any adverse responses. The official Dept. of Defense position is that depleted uranium poses marginal if any collateral risk through exposure because it is relatively “depleted” of its radioactivity, it is a cheap and readily available waste product of our many nuclear reactors. DU shells have been around for quite some time, but the government has tiptoed around the issue of its dangers by adhering to the argument that this ordinance is safe because of it’s reduced radioactivity.

The problem with DU ordinance, however, is that it is incendiary in addition to being remarkably dense and will burn and oxidize when fired, particularly upon impact with other metals — and the Government has known this for quite some time. When these shells are fired the risk is not from radiation, it is from the toxicity of the metal itself in what are called embedded particles.

These particles can lay dormant in tissue for up to ten or more years and still manage to trigger an astonishingly lethal flurry of leukemogenic activity in a matter of a few weeks. The odd thing is that the DOD itself has produced this research, clearly implicating DU in a specific and rare form of leukemia, and while steps have been taken to ensure treatment for those contaminated, the marching orders remain the same, that DU is a relatively safe and necessary risk to ensure supremacy on the battlefield.

Gus was a gunner during December 1998 Operation Desert Fox. We’d spoken occasionally about his experiences there. He described traversing miles of highway still littered with burnt out hulks of Iraqi tanks, armor, and personnel carriers, the awesome sandstorms, and the remarkably sophisticated armaments he’d been trained to deploy. It is estimated that somewhere between 500 and 1000 tons of depleted uranium ordinance was used in the the first Gulf war, the majority of which is still scattered in the sand dunes between Iraq and Kuwait where Gus served time.

Vehicles literally cut to shreds by DU ordinance still pock-mark the otherwise sterile landscape. Gus was certainly there, and his exposure to this particularly toxic heavy metal ordinance could have taken place in any number of ways. Anyone who’s fired large caliber ammunition can tell you, you are left covered in the metallic residue produced by superheated shell casings, particles could have been inhaled, ingested from dust on an MRE (meal ready to eat), through any contact with relics of the previous war, in the water, in a small cut, or simply through the skin. Whether he was exposed at some point during his tenure to Depleted Uranium is probable.

Whether it was through incidental contact, or inhalation is perhaps unknowable. What is certain is that early in October of 2007 Gus felt a lump on his head just under his scalp and he began to experience excruciating back pain. The pain eventually became so bad that he couldn’t stand or walk.

He went to the doctor and a CT scan was ordered. He was sent to the hospital that very day. The diagnosis was Acute Leukemia (AML), a form that his doctors had never encountered and for which there was little if any protocol. Gus deteriorated rapidly and less than 6 months later, at 8:10 pm on March 28, 2008, Gus passed away, leaving behind a wife and three small children.

Almost a year to the day after Gus’ death just this past March 25th, another study was published again by the Armed Services Radiologic Research Institute authored this time by Miller, Stewart and Rivas, which pinpointed a specific chemical pathway called DNA methylation — by which DU induces leukemia. The data in this particular study are presented as evidence that aberrant DNA hypomethylation is clearly associated with DU Leukemogenisis.

I am left to try and disseminate the particulars of this tragic story via a timeline of information and research authored primarily by scientific entities under the Department of Defense. Gus’ service time was years after initial repots of Gulf Syndrome (and the role of Depleted Uranium) had surfaced. The Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) research is essentially the reverse of what one may deem a conflict of interest. It is for this reason that I’m focusing on this data in particular — the studies are self implicating — they are sponsored by the Department of Defense itself. The research, dating back to 2002, categorizes the use of DU as “controversial” as there were clear leukemogenic effects in vitro (1) — so we’ve known for a very long time that this stuff is potentially lethal.

The lack of human subjects might be cited as a source of some skepticism, but chemical pathways in recent studies, in particular DNA methylation, tend to not only reflect consistent effects across different organisms, the very same chemical process is in fact implicated in a number of other non DU cancers. DNA methylation (the replacement of a hydrogen atom with a methyl group) has in fact been implicated as a carcinogenic mechanism in DNA unrelated to Depleted Uranium from as far back as a 1998 study published in the journal of Nature by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (2).

Depleted uranium is a toxic and incendiary heavy metal blasted from a gun barrel into another hunk of metal creating a readily ingestible aerosol which can remain dormant and embedded in human tissue almost indefinitely and which clearly can trigger DNA methylation — an aberrant metabolic pathway. Depleted Uranium possesses 60% of the radioactivity (for up to 50 years) of naturally occurring uranium, and some estimates suggest that more than 20% of a DU shell is aerosolized into inhalable particles on impact, and clearly, via research from the Dept. of Denfense itself, it has a causal role in the sudden onset of Acute Leukemia.

Carl Gust Danielson, a healthy man in his late twenties and a father of three, died of a rare form of leukemia after participating in military theater of operations where an agent was widely used which has been found to cause rare forms of leukemia. The military to date has performed no substantive epidemiologic studies on Gulf War Veterans to even ascertain whether cancer rates and mortality data are as skewed as some media outlets would suggest — 3 to 5 times the normal rate depending on the source.

Gus’ wife has somehow managed to put a life together for herself and her three children in the wake of this tragedy. She decorates her children’s bedrooms with teddy bears made from Gus’ old shirts and tells them stories about their dad, but his absence is a mournful silence in a childhood that would have otherwise been as happy as that of any three children anywhere. The youngest will never remember his dad, the second, will never have her dad to walk her down the isle, the oldest will never learn about cars, sports, and all the other things that dads pass on to their children.

Why? Because, as the evidence suggests, our government went ahead with the use of a dangerous heavy metal with known radiologic and toxic properties, essentially because it was cheaper than Tungsten, a metal with similar density but without the unique hazards of Depleted Uranium. We have stores of Depleted Uranium laying around, why not make ammunition out of them and let our sons fire it off in the far reaches of the earth? Who cares that it causes cancer, let that be our legacy to warn any other potential enemies, the bottom line is we must win at any cost, and our soldiers? our Marines? Well, perhaps they are casualties as well?

Gus’s wife and children could have at least been presented with a purple heart, or a combat related death benefit, instead they get a small social security pension for the children, and an empty seat at the dinner table.

When I consider this, I lose some of that optimism, some of that faith that we are a fair and benevolent people, and I am left a little less certain that we are the just and righteous nation that my hope tells me we are. I still salute the flag, I still place my hand on my chest during the national anthem at ball games, but the thought of letting my children enlist in our military fills me with a dread that is a little more pronounced.

Gus died of exposure incurred on the battlefield which amounts to a combat related injury. How long this particular “injury” took to manifest it’s lethal outcome is not relevant to the plain fact that the initial exposure/injury took place in live combat. The injury was not accidental or the result of any negligence on Gus’ part. If anything comes of this article, the two things that I’d like to see are: first, a broad systematic epidemiological study of combat veterans from 1992 to the present to investigate cancer onset, type, incidence, and severity, and secondly, to any and all victims of this particular form of Leukemia who were participants in a combat zone in which Depleted Uranium munitions were deployed, their families should be awarded a purple heart and a full combat related death benefit.

To presume that anything less might suffice, is to risk validating the notion that the lives of our sons and daughters are only worth the relative nickels and dimes saved by using DU over other more expensive metals.

Sources:
(1)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19324073

(2)
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v395/n6697/full/395089a0.html

(3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16283518?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed


Comments
Larry Miller August 30, 2009

Thank you for the moving and informative article. My condolences to the author for the loss of his friend.

One small nit to pick — more likely with the Herald de Paris’ spell-checking software than with the author. Weapons are “ordnance,” not “ordinance.” An “ordinance” is a municipal law. :-)

Matt H. August 30, 2009

A very touching article. This study about the harmful side effects of DU weapons I agree should be performed. If there is a link found between the exposure to the use of these weapons and terminal illness, then the military should at least inform the soldiers about the possible side effects (We owe them that much). Whether or not the weapon (shell, or cannon) is altered to some how prevent the exposure to the DU would seem the decent thing to do.

Crystal Chambers August 30, 2009

Thanks for the story. My father died from similar testing in the Navy that took place in the 70’s.

Rea Bruno August 30, 2009

That last sentence is so true. Our soldiers and their families have already made the biggest sacrifice they can for our country by fighting, let’s not skimp on their benefits if they are injured or killed because of it. What kind of message is this sending? This family, and others like it, deserve to be taken care of. They’ve already lost their father, why make them suffer even more? If not for his service in the United States Marine Corps, this young man would still be alive today. May God bless Marti and her three children, and I hope our country will as well. Thank you for bringing this story to life, hopefully this has been an oversight by our military that will soon be remedied.

Matt Balasis August 30, 2009

To: C. Chambers, I am so sorry for your loss. Sadly I think there are a great many more victims of this sort of thing than we realize, unfortunately the DOD has really never conducted any systematic research on the incidence of these rare cancers among veterans. The other truly frightening thing is how these particles can lay dormant for so long you have to wonder how many other potential victims are out there.

I’d also like to take the opportunity to thank Marti Danielson, who so graciously shared her family’s story and who has shown remarkable courage and strength in the wake of this tragedy.
M.B.

Carolyn Knutson August 30, 2009

Excellent article! Thank You for bringing this problem to our attention and hopefully it can be sent to someone “above” who can do something about the matter.

Roger August 31, 2009

Nothing like spreading the big lie - the soldier may be sick, but depleted uranium is not the cause - the writers, though are extemely skillful at twisting the words. None of the readers are expected to read any of the actual facts and there are thousands of pages of factual reports. None of them have found a single person who got sick from being exposed to DU.

Roger August 31, 2009

Depleted Uranium is not used in bombs and DU penetrators do not explode so the headline “Dirty Bombs” is the first big lie. DU is not even suitable for use in a dirty bomb (radiological dispersal device) - it is not radioactive enough. A dirty bomb is a high explosive core that has been wrapped with high level radioactive material. DU (Uranium 238) is one of the weakest naturally occuring radioactive materials and it is present in very minute quantities all over the world.

Here is what a real radiological dispersal device (aka “dirty bomb”) actually is like -
http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/rdd.pdf

Roger August 31, 2009

I am sorry that Carl Gust Danielson died - DU, however, has not been found to cause rare forms of Leukemia - that statement is false and apparently results from the grief of the writer, not any scientific evidence.

I also strongly doubt that Danielson was even exposed to DU. The reason that the DU round has an aluminum sabot is to prevent the DU from touching the cannon barrel and unless Danielson went into destroyed Iraqi tanks to take souvenirs, he is not likely to have become exposed to DU because he was a tank gunner. Was Danielson ever tested by the VA for DU contamination? If he was, he was probably one of the over 1700 who were found to have no contamination. Only three of over 1700 tested were found to be not contaminated.

Roger August 31, 2009

Matt Balasis - post your e-mail contact so that information can be exchanged with you. You did very poor research. Are you a relative? If not, then what drove you to write this article? I see you answer those who agree with you, what about those who tell it as it is? I will eagerly await your direct communication. You have my e-mail. If you contact me, I will put you in touch with genuine experts and you can ask them questions.

DUStory-owner@yahoogroups.com

Matt Balasis August 31, 2009

Rojer,
Your link is to a guide for what constitutes a rediologic “dirty bomb” device. You post no real links or evidence to the contrary whereas I provided my sources — research conducted from the DOD itself radiologic institute. From PubMed:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19324073

There are NUMEROUS studies to this effect.
Additionally, the fact that the government has (to date) failed to complete any comprehensive research on incidence in veterans makes any real conclusion unknowable. Surely you can grasp the implication of this failure.

You (as is often the case with many outdated Govt. sponsored entities) gravitate towards the argument that DU is not harmful because of its reduced radiologic properties — but I clearly state that the danger is in the toxicity of the embedded particles themselves, which can be easily ingested in any number of ways as the shell is readily aerosolized on impact (up to 20% of the shell) and enters the ecosystem, The data showing that DU triggers demethylation (a known cancer causing biological mechanism) is rather clear. All it takes is one tiny particle and some bad luck. Did you not check the links provided? I can provide more.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16283518?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed

my email:
neekerbreeker@live.com

Angela Corrias August 31, 2009

Great article. Whatever the WHO says, DU causes death. In Sardinia there is a huge military area where inhabitants keep getting seriously ill, farms’ animals are born dead or deformed, fields are polluted. Of course many soldiers have died because they carry out experiments so they are at risk themselves. And yet they keep with their experiments, until nobody will be able to live there anymore and they will stop. Such a shame turning paradise into hell.

Rea Bruno August 31, 2009

I appreciated the links that Matt posted at the end of his article, and they state clearly that these studies…YES, even the study that the military itself conducted, show that DU causes birth defects and fatal cancers in vets and others exposed to it.

Alex August 31, 2009

Roger are you denying that people, many of them American Soldiers, have died due to DU? I checked Matt Balasis’ facts and sources and they all seem extremely valid to my eyes. If you are some sort of official trying to cover up this article, I’m sorry. You can’t just say that hundreds even thousands of people haven’t died from mysterious diseases after serving our country. The government admits that this case is “controversial” so why are you, somebody who nobody knows, trying to say that this is all a lie! You have no right to contradict and attempt to humiliate this man for trying to get this family the help that they deserve.

Matt you have all of my support I think that you did a wonderful job.

Matthew Balasis August 31, 2009

Roger,
I tried posting this earlier but for some reason the comment didn’t save. Here are three (of many) sources that I used:
(1)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19324073
(2)
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v395/n6697/full/395089a0.html
(3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16283518?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed

The above are legitimate studies conducted by the DOD itself … it is for this reason that I used them. You cite a source that explains what the nature of a radiologic improvised “dirty bomb” is … but your reference is dated to say the least. As I clearly explained in the article above, which I can only assume you read? The danger of DU is NOT from its radiologic properties but from its toxicity. Additionally, the round is aerosolized on impact (up to 20% or more of the round), so PROXIMITY to impact sights puts you at risk as the particles infiltrate the ecosystem. All you need is to somhow injest one tiny particle and some bad luck.

Lastly, you should perhaps update your sources and look at some of the recent research, particularly the study that shows DU to trigger a metabolic process called methylation which is well known cancer causing pathway — particularly rare forms of leukemia. So a soldier, who was in the Gulf and was at the epicenter of the location where massive amounts of DU were deployed, years later goes from being perfectly healthy one day to having a rare and deadly leukemia the next, and we shouldn’t wonder whether we have mssed something? Please try not to insult our collective intelligence. Read the Pub-Med research, particularly the research conducted by:

Scientific Research Department, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI), Uniformed Services University, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603, USA.

This is what one might call information from “the horses mouth” itself — it is DOD sponsored research that clearly implicates DU in the known cancer causing metabolic pathway called DNA Methylation. I also have numerous additional sources. If you have information refuting this fairly recent research (perhaps you have not updated your sourses?) feel free to contact me:

neekerbreeker@live.com

Matt Balasis August 31, 2009

Great … now both comments appear … pardon the repetition folks.

Rea Bruno September 1, 2009

I have been following Matt Balasis’ work for quite some time and each publication cites accurate and precise sources that back up his research. I found it insulting to his readers, let alone to him, to have someone claiming that he is a liar, and implying that he, as an author, has a way of twisting the truth and avoiding facts. I respect what he has to say and trust his data. I am happy that Matt posted his contact info and am wondering if Roger contacted him or not…if so, maybe he should post a public note admitting that he was in the wrong, or at least admitting that his rudeness was incredibly uncalled for.

Thank you Matt, for your dedicated research and for bringing this real issue to the forefront. I assume that as a writer you are used to “nay sayers”, I guess I am simply not accustomed to witnessing readers insulting the integrity and honor of the author. Please don’t let that discourage you, obviously you have quite a following! I, for one, will be watching for your next article. Thank you again.

Rea

Hanns September 1, 2009

We are manufacuting tungsten 20 years, meantime, we researched the harmful of DU bomb, what’s in the war place in east Euro and Middle East.
I think, we, human can not stop the war, but we may use some green bullet but not the drity bomb such as armour pericer, the anti tank bullet. Then, if Mr. Matt
need anyhting help we can, I would like to do my best to offer.
Thanks Matt.
Hanns from Chinatungsten Online

Hanns September 1, 2009

another question: may i put all the files to the bbs of http://www.ctia.com.cn for i’m the master of this web, then many chinese may know your research?
thanks again.


If you need any more details of the above news and/or products, please visit Chinatungsten Online, or contact us directly.
Disclaimer: The article is only reflecting the opinions of the author. We have no responsibility to prove the originality and authenticity of the content, words and/or pictures. You readers should just take it as reference and check the details by yourselves. And the content is not a suggestion for investment decision. The investor takes his or her own risks if he or she operates accordingly. If you have any dissent about the contents above, please contact the relevant author, or the webmaster. We will try our best to assist the dealing of the related issues. Thanks for your visit and cooperation.

Article录入:hanns    责任编辑:hanns 
  • 上一itemArticle: 没有了

  • 下一itemArticle:
  • 【Font:Small Large】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
    Links
    China Tungsten Online Molybdenum Tungsten Wire Tungsten Bars/Rods Tungsten Bucking Bar
    Tungsten Carbides Tungsten Heater Pure Tungsten Tungsten Carbide & Alloy Tungsten Paper weight
    Tungsten Heavy Alloy Tungsten Powder China Dart Wiki of WMo Infosys
    Darts Shop Online f2f.com.cn Xatcm Global InfoMine Stainless Steel Rails
    Sheet Metal Machinery Interactive Investor Link Exchange

    Add to FavoriteAbout CTIAContact UsMore LinksRecruitmentBusiness

    Address: 2-27B,No.261-265 Jiahe RD,Xiamen,Fujian 361009 P.R.China
    Phone:+86 592-5129696,+86 592-5129595;Fax:+86 592-5129797
    Sponsors: China Tungsten Industry Association,Chinatungsten Online
     Certified by MIIT:闽B2-20090025 闽ICP备05002525号
    Copyright © 2000 - 2009 Chinatungsten Online All Rights Reserved